Is a Pacifist Character in D&D Fun or a Drag?
Nerdarchists Dave and Ted are talking about playing a pacifist character in fifth edition Dungeons & Dragons and if you know me, I’m not one to shut up during a divisive conversation. While they’re tackling the question of how to play a non-damage wizard head on, I’ll be going into why you would, should you and dabble a bit on what I believe can be an engaging way to be a less direct spellcaster. It’s not all fireballs after all.
What’s a non-damage wizard like?
Dungeons & Dragons and combatYou can’t have fun wrong. Now with that out of the way, let’s poke at this pacifist trope. D&D and games created in its vision are very combat centric. It comes from their roots as a war game and those games inherently need conflict. In the need for conflict, combat is incredibly simple to latch onto and deploy in a way everyone can grasp. It’s easy to see that in these game, combat is a major focus because a vast majority of rules are written with combat in mind. Ultimately, playing a pacifist character in D&D and keeping it one dimensional is a drag on everyone at the table, as you’re likely not participating in a major component of the game and at worst, endangering the fun of the other players by not helping them. Why you would play a game built on and themed around going into ancient ruins and fighting monsters while having no intention of doing those things is bewildering to me. Can it be done in an enjoyable and engaging way? It can, you just need some re-framing.
Pacifist character in D&D is a dirty word
The biggest issue with the label of a pacifist character in D&D is the frame of mind it puts you in. You are saying you will not fight. This is ridiculous in a world where fighting is the language of solving discourse. It’s baked into the very core of the game. However, adjusting this thought process can really open up a creative door. A wizard, whether eccentric or just dangerously curious, may think evocation or direct damage spells are a little dirty. Not that he hasn’t had to dirty up his beard in the past out of necessity, but has it in his head finding other ways to overcome a violent foe to almost be a puzzle to solve.
“How can I get this herd of raging axebeaks to stop, without killing them?” – some wizard puzzling out how to be a pacifist character in D&D
The wizard knows a fireball can end the whole fight in a fiery instant, but where is the fun in that? No thought, no creativity. Wouldn’t it be more fun to overcome this challenge with a metaphorical hand tied behind his back? This makes it super interesting for the player, having to mull over lesser-used spells and find utility in them. Not to mention, the reaction of the party when the wizard senses a truly dangerous foe and they see the true might of their companion come to the fore.
What do you think? Am I being too harsh on pacifist characters in D&D? Are you wanting to infuse some weird into your next character and try a non-damage wizard now? As always, I’m always interested in having a conversation about the hobby, especially down in the comments below.
Did you enjoy this post? Nerdarchy’s awesome volunteer staff of writers and editors do their best to create engaging, useful and fun content to share. If you like what you find here on our site, consider patronizing us in a good way through Patreon.
On top of reaching our goal of paying our writers, pledging gets you exclusive monthly content for your D&D game, opportunities to game with Nerdarchy, access to patron-only channels on our Discord and more.
With your generous support we’ll continue to create quality content between our YouTube channel and blog, invest in equipment to increase recording quality, and keep creating original publications and products to enhance your tabletop roleplaying and gaming experience.
Thank you for your consideration and as always, until next time stay nerdy!
[amazon_link asins=’0786966246,0399580948,0786966254′ template=’ProductCarousel’ store=’nerdarchy-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’af8c7f5e-756f-11e8-8e6a-ab5f0111bcf3′]